STEPPING UP THE QUALITY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING: HOW CAN NATION’S FOUR-STRANDS PRINCIPLE HELP?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Certainty in the world of language teaching can seem illusive in these ‘post-method’ times. Theories come and go, policy initiatives and education buzz words (e.g., 21st Century skills, Industry revolution 4.0, Deep Learning, Design Thinking) ebb and flow like waves on the shore, and technology is expanding the possibilities available to teachers and learners faster than ever before. Where can language educators turn for reliable principles to guide and enhance their understanding and practice? In this article, I argue that Nation’s (2007) four-strands principle offers a coherent, theoretically sustainable and highly practical answer to this question, and one that deserves more attention in the field.
Article Details
Keywords
Nation’s four-strands principle, curriculum, learning opportunities, autonomous learning, teaching approaches
References
Boers, F. (2021). Evaluating second language vocabulary and grammar instruction: A synthesis of the research on teaching words, phrases, and patterns. Routledge.
Crabbe, D. (2003). The quality of language learning opportunities. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588464
Dörnyei, Z. (2013). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209–224.
Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.3.325
Halliday, M. A. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis. Longman.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). From unity to diversity: Twenty-five years of language-teaching methodology. English Teaching Forum, 50(2), 28–38.
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Millett, S. (n.d.) Speed reading and listening fluency. https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/speed-reading-and-listening-fluency
Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0
Nation, I. S. P., & Yamamoto, A. (2012). Applying the four strands to language learning. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 173–187.
Newton, J. (2013). Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812460814
Newton, J., & Bui, T. (2020). Low-proficiency learners and task-based language teaching. In C. P. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in diverse contexts (pp. 28–40). Multilingual Matters.
Newton, J. & Nation, I.S.P. (2021). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Newton, J., & Nguyen, B. T. T. (2019). Task repetition and the public performance of speaking tasks in EFL classes at a Vietnamese high school. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1(1), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00004.new
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Shintani, N. (2012). Input-based tasks and the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: A process-product study. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811431378
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. C. Seidlhofer & Barbara (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of HG Widdowson (Vol. 2, pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371
Tyler, A. E., Ortega, L., Uno, M., & Park, H. I. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction (Vol. 49). John Benjamins.
Ur, P. (2013). Language-teaching method revisited. ELT Journal, 67(4), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct041
Waters, A. (2012). Trends and issues in ELT methods and methodology. ELT Journal, 66(4), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs038