PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY IN COMPUTER-MEDIATED SYNCHRONOUS COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGY USING GOOGLE DOCS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Participation in online learning environments is increasingly popular following the advent of several computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools. There has been empirical evidence about the positive impacts of using synchronous collaborative technologies on students’ classroom interactions and learning outcomes. This article reports on an examination of Google Docs as collaborative technology for group assignments in a content course on designing test items for young learners of English. A total 54 pre-service EFL teachers were examined for their perceived levels of participation, learning, social, and teaching presence in the online community where Google Docs was utilized as a collaborative platform for sharing work and receiving feedback. Main findings indicate the pre-service teachers’ overall positive perceptions of the use of Google Docs, and their perceived levels of learning, teaching, and social presence were better than those in the face-to-face meeting condition. The results suggest a cohesive community where exchange of ideas and feedback took place effectively and Google Docs was perceived to improve feedback efficiency thanks to its synchronous and asynchronous feedback mechanisms. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for the use of CMC technologies in EFL classrooms and suggestions for future research.
Article Details
Keywords
Google Docs, community of inquiry, learning presence, teaching presence, social presence, synchronous collaborative tool
References
Byng, G. (2015, December 09). Should my cyber-self “unfriend” you? Ruminate, 63. https://www.ruminatemagazine.com/blogs/ruminate-blog/should-my-cyber-self-unfriend-you
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chou, P. N., & Chen, W. F. (2010). Chinese students’ perceptions of online learning in western discussion boards: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(2), 35–48.
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on efl learners’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815.
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 527-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527362
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Hafour, M., & Al-Rashidy, A. M. (2020). Storyboarding-based collaborative narratives on Google Docs: Fostering EFL learners’ writing fluency, syntactic complexity, and overall performance. JALTCALL Journal, 16(3), 123-146. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v16n3.393
Hayes, S., Smith, S. U., & Shea, P. (2015). Expanding learning presence to account for the direction of regulative intent: Self-, co- and shared regulation in online learning. Online Learning, 19(3), 15-31.
Ishtaiwa, F. F., & Aburezeq, I. M. (2015). The impact of Google Docs on student collaboration: A UAE case study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 85-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.004
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.
Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 126, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2018.06.032
Kilis, S. (2016). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition, and motivation [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12620108/index.pdf
Kochem, T., Muhammad, A. A., Karatay, Y., Jin, H., Hegelheimer, V. (2020). Considerations for future technology development based on EFL teachers’ integration of technology. In M. Kruk & M. Peterson (Eds.), New technological applications for foreign and second language learning and teaching (pp. 239-260) . IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2591-3.ch012
Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2019). Reframing technology’s role in language teaching: A retrospective report. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 8-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000011
Molloy, E., & Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2019). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022). Building bridges to advance the community of inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989
Shintani, N. (2015). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2).
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
Wertz, R. E. H. (2022). Learning presence within the community of inquiry framework: An alternative measurement survey for a four-factor model. The Internet and Higher Education, 52, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100832
Wladis, C., Conway, K. M., & Hachey, A. C. (2016). Assessing readiness for online education – Research models for identifying students at risk. Online Learning, 20(3), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj. v20i3.980
Zimmermann, N. (2020). The digital self: Digital transformation in learning for active citizenship. DARE.