A PROPOSED FRAME OF REFERENCE FOR RESEARCH OF SAME - DIFFERENCE IN CROSSCULTURAL COMMUNICATION AND PRAGMATIC FAILURE IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT (ARTICLE 6)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Following article 5, in which the models that locate the three types of components and display the interbeing (interconnectivity, interdependence and interactionality) within and among these types are introduced and the grid of impact components with transcendental assumptions for the test of pragmatic expressions is proposed, this article discusses the co-activation of layers in the models (co-influence in the layer of influence, co-action in that of impact, co-occurence in that of manifestation, co-performance in that of interaction) and the to-life and to-research orientations before proposing a Languages and Cultures in Interaction (LCI) matrix and two process models for LCI research in the next article.
Article Details
Keywords
frame of reference, co-activation, co-influence, co-action, co-occurrence, co-performance, to life, to research
References
Chen, S. X. (2010). From emic to etic: Exporting indigenous constructs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 364–378.
Dai, X., E., & Chen, G-M (ed.). (2014). Intercultural Communication Competence: Conceptualization and its Development in Cultural Contexts and Interactions. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Dai, X., E., & Chen, G-M. (2017). Conflict Management and Intercultural Communication: The Art of Intercultural Harmony. Routledge, London and New York.
Davel, E., Dupuis, J. P., & Chanlat, J. O. (2013). Cross-Cultural Management: Culture and Management Across the World. Taylor & Francis.
Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (2009). Cross-Cultural Research Methods. AltaMira Press.
Fang, T. (2012). Yin Yang: A New Perspective on Culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25-50.
Greenfield, P. M. (1996). Culture as process: Empirical methodology for cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, (rev. ed.; Vol. 1, pp. 301–346). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (1997). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication (3rd. Ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Heine, S. J. (2005). Where Is the Evidence for Pancultural Self-Enhancement? A Reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 531-538.
Hymes, D. (1986). Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life. In J. J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics (pp. 35-71). Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnstone, B. and Marcellino, W. (2010). Dell Hymes and the Ethnography of Communication. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, & P. Kerswill (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Sage Publishers.
Karenga, M. (1997). Kawaida: A communitarian African philosophy. Los Aneles: University
Maude, B. (2011). Managing Cross-Cultural Communication: Principles and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Miike, Y. (2003). Toward an Alternative Megatheory of Human Communication. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 105-116.
Nguyen, Q. (2004). Issues in Intracultural and Cross-Cultural Communication. VNU Press.
Nguyen, Q. (2007). Paralanguage. Journal of Linguistics, 5(260), 1-19.
Nguyen, Q. (2008). Nonverbal Communication across Cultures. Social Sciences Publishing House.
Nguyen, Q. (2011). Hypotheses of Culture-Communication Correlation. Journal of Linguistics, 1(260), 19-38.
Nguyen, Q. (2014). Transfers in Cross-Cultural Communication. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 30(3), 14-22.
Nguyen, Q. (2017). Intercultural Communicative Competence: A Proposed Model. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 33(5), 1-14.
Nguyen, Q. (2019). Face and Politeness in Communication Revisited. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 35(2), 1-14.
Nguyen, Q. (2020). Languages and Cultures in Interaction: Communication Breakdown and Pragmatic Failure. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(2), 1-10.
Nguyen, Q. (2021a). A Proposed Frame of Reference for Research of Same-Difference in Cross-Cultural Communication and Pragmatic Failure in Intercultural Communication: Reference of Manifestation - Article 1. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(2), 1-16.
Nguyen, Q. (2021b). A Proposed Frame of Reference for Research of Same-Difference in Cross-Cultural Communication and Pragmatic Failure in Intercultural Communication: Reference of Manifestation - Article 2. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(5), 1-29.
Nguyen, Q. (2022). A Proposed Frame of Reference for Research of Same-Difference in Cross-Cultural Communication and Pragmatic Failure in Intercultural Communication: Reference of Impact - Article 3. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 38(4), 1-21.
Nguyen, Q. (2023a). A Proposed Frame of Reference for Research of Same-Difference in Cross-Cultural Communication and Pragmatic Failure in Intercultural Communication: Reference of Impact - Article 4. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 38(4), 1-21.
Nguyen, Q. (2023b). A Proposed Frame of Reference for Research of Same-Difference in Cross-Cultural Communication and Pragmatic Failure in Intercultural Communication: Reference of Impact - Article 5. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 39(5), 1-45.
Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Backwell Publishing.
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural Self-Enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 60-79.
Smith, S. W., & Steven, R. W. (2010). New Directions in Interpersonal Communication Research. Sage.
Thu, N., Hood, S., Martin, J. R., Painter, C., Smith, B. A., & Zappavigna, M. (2021). Modelling Paralanguage Using Systemic Functional Semiotics: Theory and Application. Bloomsbury Academic, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L. C. (2012). Understanding Intercultural Communication (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Inc.