Somme Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis of the Article “Kyoto Protocol is not Enough to Tackle Climate Change”

Luu Thi Kim Nhung1,
1 Faculty of English, Hanoi National University of Education

Main Article Content

Abstract

From a critical discourse analysis perspective, this research analyses a newspaper article entitled “Kyoto Protocol is not enough to tackle climate change” in The Independent. In light of Norman Fairclough’s Dialectical Relational Approach and Theo van Leeuwen’s Linguistically-Oriented Conceptual Framework, such lexico-syntactic categories as passivation, nominalization, and metaphors have been unveiled, which convey the attitudes of nations, organizations, individuals toward this event. Most strikingly presented is the UK’s positive attitude in support of the efforts against climate change. In addition, person dexis and implicit positive vocabulary help depict the journalist’s position, that is, to persuade the U.S. to jointly promote globally concerted efforts in addressing the challenge of climate change. The paper concludes with some recommendations on the application of critical discourse analysis in language studies at higher education, and suggestions for future research.

Article Details

References

[1] Livesey, Sharon M., Global Warming Wars: Rhetorical and Discourse Analytic Approaches to ExxonMobil’s corporate public discourse, Journal of Business Communication, 39 (2002) 117.
[2] Boykoff, M., The Cultural Politics of Climate Change Discourse in UK Tabloids, Political Geography, 27 (2008) 549.
[3] Tillinghast, W & McCann, M., Climate Change in Four News Magazines: 1989-2009, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3 (1) (2013) 22.
[4] N. Fairclough, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, Longman, London, 1995.
[5] N. Fairclough, Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research, Routledge, London, 2003.
[6] T. van Leeuwen, The Representation of Social Actors in Discouse. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Text and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32-70), Routledge, London, 1996.
[7] R. Wodak & M. Meyer, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 3rd ed, Sage, London, 2012.
[8] M. Bloor & T. Bloor, The Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis: An Introduction, Hodder, London, 2007.
[9] M. Foucault, The Archeology of Knowledge, Routledge, London, 2002.
[10] Nguyễn Hòa, Phân tích diễn ngôn phê phán là gì?, Ngôn ngữ, 2 (2005) 13.
[11] Diệp Quang Ban, Giới thiệu sơ bộ: “Phê bình ngôn ngữ học” – sự kết nối ngôn ngữ học và văn học trong giai đoạn sau cấu trúc luận và kí hiệu học, Ngôn ngữ, 7 (2010) 1.
[12] D. Merkl-Davies & V. Koller, ‘Metaphoring’ people out of this world: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a chairman’s statement of UK defence firm, Accounting Forum, 36 (3) (2012) 178. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839174 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1839174.
[13] Wikipedia. Retrieved March 10, 2013. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Independent
[14] J. E. Richardson, Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.