CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS IN THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE BETWEEN DONALD J. TRUMP AND KAMALA HARRIS IN 2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study analyzes the conceptual metaphors employed by Kamala Harris and Donald J. Trump during the 2024 U.S. presidential debate, held in Philadelphia and broadcast by ABC News. Drawing on the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 2003; Kövecses, 2020), the research examines metaphorical language across eight key discussion areas (economy, abortion, immigration, weaponization, transfer of power, war, health care, and climate change) and classifies them according to the three main conceptual metaphor types (Structural, Orientational, and Ontological). Adopting a mixed-methods approach, it combines qualitative analysis with basic quantitative insights. Metaphors are identified, grouped, and interpreted to reveal the candidates’ distinct conceptual framings of important issues. The findings suggest that while both candidates rely on metaphors to shape their ideologies, Trump employs metaphors with a markedly greater number than Harris. Structural metaphor is the dominant type overall, driven by Trump’s overwhelming reliance on this category. Specifically, Trump frequently uses combative and control-oriented metaphors to emphasize strength and dominance, whereas Harris tends to draw on unity-based and care-based metaphors highlighting cooperation, protection, and shared values.
Keywords
Conceptual Metaphor Theory, mixed-methods approach, combative and control-oriented metaphors, unity-based and care-based metaphors
Article Details
References
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kieu, T. T. H. (2025). Conceptual metaphors in the remarks by General Secretary To Lam at the 8th Session, 15th National Assembly, 2024. Language & Life, 7(370), 20–34.
Koller, V., & Semino, E. (2009). Metaphor in political discourse: The European Union and the United Kingdom. Journal of Language and Politics, 8(1), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.1.06kol
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2016). Language and emotion. Emotion Review, 8(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915595097
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lapka, O. (2021). Language of persuasion: Analysis of conceptual metaphors in political discourse. The Grove: Working Papers on English Studies, 28, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.28.6607
Maierová, E. (2024). A linguistic analysis of the Trump-Harris debate on 10 September 2024 [Manuscript]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387970248_A_Linguistic_Analysis_of_the_Trump-Harris-Debate-on-10-September-2024
Mercieca, J. (2021). Demagogue for president: The rhetorical genius of Donald Trump. Texas A&M University Press.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ott, B. L., & Dickinson, G. (2019). The Twitter presidency: Donald J. Trump and the politics of white rage. Routledge.
Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Ideology (noun). In Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Retrieved May 28, 2025, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/ideology?q=ideology
Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Politician (noun). In Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Retrieved May 29, 2025, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/politician?q=politician
Thompson, J. B. (1996). Ideology and modern culture: Critical social theory in the era of mass communication. Stanford University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 17–33). Harwood Academic Publishers.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). SAGE Publications.
Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Palgrave Macmillan.