TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCES AND PERCEPTIONS OF USING CHATGPT IN WRITING INSTRUCTION

Thi Bich Thuy Do1,
1 ULIS

Main Article Content

Abstract

While several studies have explored teachers’ experiences and perceptions of using ChatGPT in English as a foreign language teaching, little research has examined its role in French writing instruction. This study aims to investigate how French teachers at high schools and universities in Vietnam utilise ChatGPT for teaching essay writing, as well as its perceived benefits and challenges. Quantitative data were collected through an online 42-item questionnaire completed by 53 teachers who used ChatGPT in essay writing courses. Descriptive statistical analysis using SPSS 26 reveals that the most common applications of ChatGPT before lessons included generating outlines, creating essay samples, and finding reading materials. During lesson implementation, teachers primarily encouraged students to avoid excessive reliance on ChatGPT when writing their essays while allowing them to use it for generating outlines. In assessment, the most reported practices involved integrating writing tasks into ChatGPT prompts, correcting errors the AI failed to detect, and requiring students to revise their essays based on ChatGPT’s feedback. However, the findings indicate that ChatGPT was rarely used for generating grammar and vocabulary exercises or creating essay topics. Teachers also tended to avoid using ChatGPT for grading or requiring students to analyse ChatGPT’s feedback. Teachers recognised its benefits, such as saving time in lesson preparation, providing instant feedback, and facilitating students’ access to reading materials, but expressed concerns about risks related to academic dishonesty and the inaccuracy of ChatGPT-generated feedback. To enhance the effective use of ChatGPT in writing instruction, professional training is necessary, particularly in prompt engineering and AI-supported grammar and vocabulary instruction.

Article Details

References

Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 584-607.
Baskara, R. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343-358. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1391490.pdf
Cetin, Y., Tas, Ö., Alakus, H., & Kaplan, H. İ. (2024). Examining school principals' and teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT in education. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 85-96. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1447510.pdf
Elsayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of computer assisted learning, 40(3), 931-945.
Fang, T., Yang, S., Lan, K., Wong, D. F., Hu, J., Chao, L. S., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Is ChatGPT a highly fluent grammatical error correction system? A comprehensive evaluation. arXiv:2304.01746. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.01746
Fokides, E., & Peristeraki, E. (2025). Comparing ChatGPT's correction and feedback comments with that of educators in the context of primary students' short essays written in English and Greek. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 2577-2621.
http://opensimserver.aegean.gr/publications/2024_paper_Fokides_Peristeraki_EN.pdf
Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Azhar, K. A. (2022). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT. Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97-111.
Lidén, A., & Nilros, K. (2020). Perceived benefits and limitations of chatbots in higher education. Linnaeus University, Kalmar.
Kalenda, P. J., Rath, L., Abugasea Heidt, M., & Wright, A. (2024). Pre-service Teacher Perceptions of ChatGPT for Lesson Plan Generation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 53(3), 219-241.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.
Kavak, V. İ., Evis, D., & Ekinci, A. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in language education. Experimental and Applied Medical Science, 5(2), 72-82. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3833109
Kiptonui, B. P., Too, J. K., & Mukwa, C. W. (2018). Teacher Attitude towards Use of Chatbots in. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1586-1597. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1183982.pdf
Nguyen, T. C. (2023). University teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in language teaching and assessment. In Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 116-128). https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2349
Nguyen, T. M. (2024). Conceptual metaphors of artificial intelligence and AI development in the Guardian newspaper. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(4), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5345
Nguyen, T. T. H. (2023). EFL teachers’ perspectives toward the use of ChatGPT in writing classes: A case study at Van Lang University. International Journal of Language Instruction, 2(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.23231
Nugroho, A., Putro, N. H., Syamsi, K., Mutiaraningrum, I., & Wulandari, F. D. (2024). Teacher’s experience using ChatGPT in language teaching: An exploratory study. Computers in the Schools, 1–20.
Octavio, M. M., Argüello, M. V. G., & Pujolà, J. T. (2024). ChatGPT as an AI L2 teaching support: A case study of an EFL teacher. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 1142. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1142
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752.
Uljens, M. (2004). School didactics and learning: A school didactic model framing an analysis of pedagogical implications of learning theory. Psychology Press.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
Wu, H., Wang, W., Wan, Y., Jiao, W., & Lyu, M. (2023). Chatgpt or grammarly? Evaluating chatgpt on grammatical error correction benchmark. arXiv:2303.13648.
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
Zhu, C., Sun, M., Luo, J., Li, T., & Wang, M. (2023). How to Harness the Potential of ChatGPT in Education? Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 15(2), 133-152. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1394645.pdf