A PROPOSED FRAME OF REFERENCE FOR RESEARCH OF SAME-DIFFERENCE IN CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION AND PRAGMATIC FAILURE IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: REFERENCE OF IMPACT (COMMUNICATION) (ARTICLE 3)

Nguyen Quang1,
1 University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Main Article Content

Abstract

Following articles 1 and 2 that review different approaches by different scholars and present the author’s ways for the reference direction of ‘Manifestation’ (culture) in what he terms ‘the 3-D approach’, this article focuses on the reference direction of ‘Impact’ (communication) with types of communication model presented (transmissional model, interactive model, transactional model), intercultural and EC models/paradigms/grids reviewed and classified (paradigmatic assumptions by Chen & An, process model of intercultural communication by Ting-Toomey & Chung, interpersonal/intercultural model by Gudykunst & Kim, SPEAKING model/grid by Hymes and EC model/grid by Saville-Troike). Comments on them are each made before the author’s own is to be given in the articles that follow.

Article Details

References

Bauman, R. (1999). Genre. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1/2), 84–87.
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. Sage Publications.
Chanlat, J.-F., Davel, E., & Dupuis, J.-P. (2013). Cross-cultural management: Culture and management across the world. Taylor & Francis.
Chen, G.-M. (2017). The yin and yang of conflict management and resolution: A Chinese perspective. In X. D. Dai & G.-M. Chen (Eds), Conflict management and intercultural communication: The art of intercultural harmony (pp. 11-19). Routledge.
Chen, G.-M., & An, R. (2009). A Chinese model of intercultural leadership competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The Sage handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 196-208). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
Dai, X. D., & Chen, G.-M. (2017). Conflict management and intercultural communication: The art of intercultural harmony. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266916
Ellis, R., & McClintock, A. (1990). You take my meaning: Theory into practice in human communication. Edward Arnold.
Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (2009). Cross-cultural research methods. AltaMira Press.
Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (1997). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Hymes, D. H. (1986). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 35-71). Blackwell.
Johnstone, B., & Marcellino, W. (2010). Dell Hymes and the ethnography of communication. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone & P. Kerswill (Eds.), The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 57-66). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Manning, J. (2014). A constitutive approach to interpersonal communication studies. Communication Studies, 65(4), 432-440.
Maude, B. (2011). Managing cross-cultural communication: Principles and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nguyễn, Q. (2008). Giao tiếp phi ngôn từ qua các nền văn hoá. Nhà xuất bản Khoa học xã hội.
Nguyễn, Q. (2011). Giả thuyết về quan hệ văn hoá-giao tiếp. Ngôn ngữ, 1(260), 19-38.
Nguyễn, Q. (2020). Ngôn ngữ và văn hoá trong tương tác: Ngừng trệ giao tiếp và sự cố dụng học. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu nước ngoài, 36(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4532
Nguyễn, Q. (2021a). Hệ qui chiếu được đề xuất cho nghiên cứu tương đồng-dị biệt trong giao tiếp giao văn hoá và sự cố dụng học trong giao tiếp liên văn hoá: Qui chiếu biểu hiện (văn hoá) – Bài 1. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu nước ngoài, 37(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4696
Nguyễn, Q. (2021b). Hệ qui chiếu được đề xuất cho nghiên cứu tương đồng-dị biệt trong giao tiếp giao văn hoá và sự cố dụng học trong giao tiếp liên văn hoá: Qui chiếu biểu hiện (văn hoá) – Bài 2. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu nước ngoài, 37(5), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4764
Saville-Troike, M. (1996). The ethnography of communication. In S. L. McKay (Ed.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 351-382). Cambridge University Press.
Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication: An introduction (3rd ed.). Backwell Publishing.
Schramm, W. (1997). The beginnings of communication study in America. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Shannon, C., & Weaver, M. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L. C. (2012). Understanding intercultural communication (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.