TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE VIETNAMESE ECONOMIC CONTRACTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR

Nguyen Thi Nhat Linh1,2,
1 Faculty of Economics
2 Ho Chi Minh City University of Agriculture and Forestry

Main Article Content

Abstract

The economic contract is a typical type of discourse that depends on the agreement between parties. This paper adopted the theoretical framework of Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) to carry out a transitivity analysis of the ideational function in the Vietnamese economic contract in order to explore the features of this genre, a type of legal discourse. In the economic contract, there are six processes, among which the material process and existential process are dominantly used while the relational process, mental process, behavioral process, and verbal process, each just accounts for the small percentage. These processes are employed in order to express the parties’ experience through legislation of rights, duties, obligation, remedies that they reach during the negotiation. The dominance of such specific processes reflects some features of legal discourse such as conciseness, clearness, exactness.

Article Details

References

Ali, J. H. M. (2019). Ecolinguistics and systemic functional linguistics (SFL): Transitivity in 'Climate Change in Egypt' by Ali Masria. Beni-Suef University International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 9-38.
Anggraini, N. (2018). Transitivity process and ideological construction of Donald Trump's speeches (Publication No. A73214051) [Undergraduate degree, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/id/eprint/23434
Athukorala, P.-c. (2019). Economic transition and export performance in Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 1(2), 96-114.
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2013). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. Routledge.
Darani, L. H. (2014). Persuasive style and its realization through transitivity analysis: A SFL perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 179-186.
Diep, Q. B. (2005). Ngữ pháp tiếng Việt [Vietnamese Grammar]. Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
Hoang, V. V. (2005). The grammar of material processes in Vietnamese. VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, (4E), 47-61.
Hoang, V. V. (2018). “Bánh trôi nước” and three English versions of translation: A systemic functional comparison. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(4), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4279
Hoang, V. V. (2019). An experiential grammar of the Vietnamese clause. Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Hoang, V. V. (2020). The language of Vietnamese school science textbooks: A transitivity analysis of seven lessons (texts) of biology 8. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 14(1-2), 1-35.
Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The language of the law. Wipf and Stock.
Naz, S., Alvi, S. D., & Baseer, A. (2012). Political language of Benazir Bhutto: A transitivity analysis of her speech ‘Democratization in Pakistan’. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(8), 125-141.
Riris, H. (2019). Transitivity process analysis of Joko Widodo’s Speech at the APEC CEO Summit. International Journal of Innovation Education and Research, 7(5), 1-11.
Sihura, M. (2019). Transitivity process in Frozen movie: A study of systemic functional grammar. International Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2(2), 79-85.
Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.
Tran, T. T. L. (2015). Nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ văn bản hợp đồng tiếng Việt từ bình diện phân tích diễn ngôn [The study of Vietnamese contract language on the aspect of discourse analysis] [Doctoral thesis, Vietnam National University]. https://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/14771
Zahoor, M., & Janjua, F. (2016). Character construction in tributive songs: Transitivity analysis of the song "I am Malala". TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 20(2), 201-213.
Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s first television debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics English Literature, 6(7), 65-72.