A PROPOSED FRAME OF REFERENCE FOR RESEARCH OF SAME - DIFFERENCE IN CROSS - CULTURAL COMMUNICATION AND PRAGMATIC FAILURE IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: REFERENCE OF MANIFESTATION (CULTURE) (ARTICLE 2)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Following a critical review of different approaches to the reference of ‘Manifestation’ by different scholars in the previous article, an approach with 14 categorical dimensions and their metapragmatic manifestations and pragmatic expressions isproposed. A conceptual model of ontological and epistemological nature is also advanced for this reference direction in order to clarify the author’s perspective on the one hand and to suggest operational models for intercultural/cross-cultural research of manifestations/expressions of specific categorical dimensions on the other.
Article Details
Keywords
frame of reference, reference of manifestation, categorical dimension, verbal expression
References
Courtright, J., Wolfe, R., & Baldwin, J. (2011). Intercultural typologies and public relations research: A critique of Hofstede’s dimensions. In N. Bardhan & C. K. Weave (Eds.), Public relations in global cultural contexts: Multi-paradigmatic perspectives (pp. 108-139). Routledge.
Davel, E., Dupuis, J. P., & Chanlat, J. O. (2013). Cross-cultural management: Culture and management across the world. Taylor & Francis.
Fang, T. (2006). From ‘Onion’ to ‘Ocean’: Paradox and change in national cultures. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(4), 71-90.
Fang, T. (2012). Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25-50.
Hall, E. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday.
Hall, E. (1976). Beyond culture. Doubleday.
Hall, E. (1983). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Doubleday.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Culture and organizations – Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. McGraw-Hill.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage.
Lewis, R. D. (1999). When cultures collide: Managing successfully across cultures (Revised ed.). Nicholas Brealey.
Maude, B. (2011). Managing cross-cultural communication: Principles and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and the consequences: A triumph of faith - A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89-118.
Minkov, M. (2018). A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: Old evidence and new data from 56 countries. Cross-Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(2), 231-256.
Nguyễn, Q. (2011). Giả thuyết về quan hệ văn hóa-giao tiếp. Ngôn ngữ, (1), 19-38.
Nguyễn, Q. (2020). Ngôn ngữ và văn hóa trong tương tác: Ngừng trệ giao tiếp và sự cố dụng học. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu nước ngoài, 36(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4532
Nguyễn, Q. (2021). Hệ qui chiếu được đề xuất cho nghiên cứu tương đồng-dị biệt trong giao tiếp giao văn hóa và sự cố dụng học trong giao tiếp liên văn hóa: Qui chiếu biểu hiện (Văn hóa). Tạp chí Nghiên cứu nước ngoài, 37(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4696
Signorini, P., Wiesemes, R., & Murphy, R. (2009). Developing alternative frameworks for exploring intercultural learning: A critique of Hofstede's cultural difference model. Teaching in Higher Education Critical Perspectives, 14(3), 253-264.
Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. McGraw-Hill.