GENDER REPRESENTATION IN CHILDREN’S STORIES: A TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Main Article Content
The overriding purpose of this study is to examine the features of gender representation in the English stories for children by analyzing the transitivity system, which is a component in the ideational meaning of systemic functional grammar, associated with the internationally influential linguist M.A.K Halliday. The data were collected from the website https://www.bedtimeshortstories.com and analyzed at the levels of clause and word group. The results show that all the six types of transitivity processes are found, with material processes having the highest frequency and followed by verbal, mental, relational, behavioral and existential processes. Besides, both genders are represented in a relatively equal manner in terms of occurrences as participants in different process types, though some gender bias still perpetuates. This may present a tangible challenge for those who attempt to use stories for children for educational purposes.
gender representation, children’s stories, transitivity, Systemic functional grammar
Bettelheim, B. (2010). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. Vintage Books.
Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Hampton Press.
Esen, Y. (2007). Sexism in school textbooks prepared under education reform in Turkey. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(2), 109-115. http://www.jceps.com/archives/560
Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). The application of functional linguistics in exposing gender bias in Iranian highschool English textbooks. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n1p85
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold.
Helleis, L. D (2004). Differentiation of gender roles and sex frequency in children’s literature [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Maimonides University.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mathuvi, P. N, Ireri, A. M., Mukuni, D. M., Njagi, A. M., & Karugu, N. I. (2012). An analysis of gender displays in selected children picture books in Kenya. International Journal of Arts, 2(5), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arts.20120205.01
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). The system of transitivity: An exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of Language, 6(1), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.6.1.02mat
McCabe, J., Fairchild, E., Grauerholz, L., Pescosolido, B. A., & Tope, D. (2011). Gender in twentieth-century children's books: Patterns of disparity in titles and central characters. Gender & Society, 25(2), 197-226. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0891243211398358
Nazari, A. (2007). Power on the page: Examining embedded power relations in English textbooks for Iranian students. In R. D. Reiss, R. Depalma & E. Atkinson (Eds.), Marginality and difference in education and beyond (pp. 135-148). Trentham Books.
Nguyen, T. T. H. (2017). Language and gender studies: Past and current approaches and debates. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 33(6), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.421
Sari, N. T. A. (2011). Visible boys, invisible girls: The representation of gender in Learn English with Tito. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 84 -104. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v1i1.101
Skelton, C. (1997). Revisiting gender issues in reading schemes. Education, 3(13), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279785200091
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Northeastern University Press.
Ullah, H. (2013). Reproduction of class and gender hierarchies through education in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Main Library University of Peshawar.