VIETNAMESE EFL COLLEGE STUDENTS’ SENSITIVITY TO THE ENGLISH MASS-COUNT DISTINCTION

Nguyen Thi Quyen1,
1 Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Finance

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper examines how Vietnamese learners of L2 English interpret the English mass-count distinction. In a picture-based judgment experiment, sixty-two college students learning English as their L2 made judgments that reflect their sensitivity to the English mass-count distinction and morphosyntax-semantics mappings. The findings indicate that Vietnamese learners of L2 English correctly based their judgments on number for count nouns (e.g., cup) and object-mass nouns (e.g., furniture), and on volume for substance-mass nouns (e.g., milk). In addition, Vietnamese learners performed at chance level with English flexible nouns, i.e., nouns that are interpreted as count in the presence of the plural marker -s and as mass in its absence. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between learners’ L2 proficiency scores and their judgments. Taken together, these findings suggest that Vietnamese college students are insensitive to the morphosyntactic cues of English flexible nouns when interpreting their meaning. Such insensitivity might be due to L1 effects and can be independent of L2 proficiency.

Article Details

References

Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2009). The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26(3), 217-252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp003
Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2018). Quantity judgment and the mass-count distinction across languages: Advances, problems, and future directions for research. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.536
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantitative judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.009
Barner, D., Wagner, L., Snedeker, J., & Chow, K. (2008). Events and the ontology of individuals: Verbs as a source of individuating mass and count nouns. Cognition, 106(2), 805-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.001
Cheng, C-Y. (1973). Response to Moravcsik. In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches to natural language (pp. 286-288). D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509-542. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339-405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506
Inagaki, S. (2014). Syntax–semantics mappings as a source of difficulty in Japanese speakers’ acquisition of the mass–count distinction in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 464-477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000540
Ionin, T., Heejeong, K., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3-69. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/s15327817la1201_2
Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language (pp. 302-323). de Gruyter.
MacDonald, D. & Carroll S., (2018) Second-language processing of English mass-count nouns by native-speakers of Korean. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), Article 46. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.363
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2002). The L2 acquisition of morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the aspectual tenses preterite and imperfect. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & J. M. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax (pp. 153-178). Kluwer.
Nguyen, T. Q. (2017). The role of semantic features on the L2 acquisition of English articles. Studies in Linguistics, 45, 259-299. https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..45.201710.259
Nguyen, T. Q. (2018). English article choices by Vietnamese EFL learners. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(2), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4248
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. MIT Press.
Wiśniewski, E. J., Imai, M., & Casey, L. (1996). On the equivalence of superordinate concepts. Cognition, 60(3), 269-298. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0010-0277(96)00707-x
Yin, B., & O'Brien, B. (2018). Mass-count distinction in Chinese-English bilingual students. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.382