PROBLEM AS OPPORTUNITY: METACOGNITIVE LEARNING FOR DOCTORAL STUDENTS DURING THE PANDEMIC
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Our pre-pandemic hubris of touting our times as an advanced digital age has given way to misgivings and scepticism as we slowly realise the limits of technological advances and how our teaching and learning practices have not been able to completely sever from age-old traditions. With unprecedented changes triggered by the global pandemic which saw schools close and move on to online spaces within the span of a few weeks all the world over, there has been a flurry of academic research into student disengagement, better integration of technology and best practices in adaptation of teaching and learning. However, much less attention has been paid to the needs of educators themselves as learners, such as those engaged in the essentially solitary experience of doctoral studies, often characterised by writer’s block, procrastination or lack of motivation.
Yet the COVID-19 scenario has opened up splendid and unprecedented opportunities for reflection into our own practices. This paper critically considers the value of metacognition and self-regulated learning which current circumstances can nurture in unique ways. Studies have shown that the use of metacognitive strategies - which help learners understand their own learning - can amount to several months of progress. Much more than just learning to learn, such strategies also activate prior knowledge and make learners become higher-order agents overlooking their own learning while also being part of it, thereby leading to independent and transferrable practice. Drawing on anecdotal case studies of the presenter’s doctoral students, the paper will offer insights into ways in which early-career researchers can become effective and self-regulated learners who can take control of their own cognitive and motivational processes in planning, monitoring and evaluating skills and practices. In particular, the paper will propose guidelines through which a “securitization” can be achieved for a “post-pandemic pedagogy” (Murphy, 2020) for doctoral studies.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
metacognitive learning, self-regulated learning, autoethnography, COVID-19, self-evaluation, doctoral studies, PhD, graduate research
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aydemir, D., & Ulusu, N. N. (2020). Challenges for PhD students during COVID-19 pandemic: Turning crisis into an opportunity. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 428-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21351
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, (15), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
Berne, J. (2004). Think-aloud protocol and adult learners. Adult Basic Education, 14(3), 153.
Bråten, I. (1991). Vygotsky as precursor to metacognitive theory: II. Vygotsky as metacognitivist. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, (35)4, 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383910350406
Byrom, N. (2020). COVID-19 and the research community: The challenges of lockdown for early-career researchers. eLife 2020 9:e59634. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59634
Cahusac ¬de ¬Caux, B. (2019). A short history of doctoral studies. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay & B. Cahusac ¬de -Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education (pp. 9-17). Springer.
Chakma, U., Li, B., & Kabuhung, G. (upcoming). Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the covid-19 pandemic.
Deeble, M. (2020, July 16). Evidence for Learning’s rapid response to Covid-19. Social Ventures Australia. https://www.socialventures.com.au/sva-quarterly/evidence-for-learnings-rapid-response-to-covid-19/
Evidence for Learning (2020). Metacognition and self‑regulated learning. https://www.evidenceforlearning.org.au/guidance-reports/metacognition-and-selfregulated-learning/
Firth, K. (2013). Generative writing & #shutupandwrite. Research Degree Insiders. https://researchvoodoo.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/generative_writing/
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, (20)1, 6-30.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
Mewburn, I., Osborne, L., & Caldwell, G. (2014). Shut up & write! Some surprising uses of cafés and crowds in doctoral writing. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond (pp. 218-232). Routledge.
Murphy, M. P. A. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492-505.
Nelson, R. (2018). Creativity crisis: Toward a post-constructivist educational future. Monash University Publishing.
O'Dwyer, S. T., McDonough, S. L., Jefferson, R., Goff, J. A., & Redman-MacLaren, M. (2017). Writing groups in the digital age: A case study analysis of Shut Up & Write Tuesdays. In A. Esposito (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the impact of digital technologies on scholarly inquiry (pp. 249-269). IGI Global.
Pretorius, L. (2019). Prelude: The topic chooses the researcher. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay & B. Cahusac -de ¬Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education (pp. 3-8). Springer.
Pretorius, L., & Cutri, J. (2019). Autoethnography: Researching personal experiences. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay & B. Cahusac ¬de ¬Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education (pp. 27-34). Springer.
Ryan, J., & Viete, R. (2009). Respectful interactions: Learning with international students in the English-speaking academy. Teaching in Higher education, 14(3), 303-314.
Schuster, C., Stebner, F., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2020). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: An experimental training study. Metacognition Learning, 15, 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09237-5
Tarricone, P. (2011). A taxonomy of metacognition. Academic Press.
Viete, R., & Ha, P. L. (2007). The growth of voice: Expanding possibilities for representing self in research writing. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 39-57.
Viete, R., & Peeler, E. (2007). Respectful encounters: Valuing each other in teacher professional learning contexts. In A. Berry, A. Clemans & A. Kostogriz (Eds.), Dimensions of Professional Learning (pp. 177-190). Brill Sense.
Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, (30)3, 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489237
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Winne, P. H. (2018). Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 254-270). Routledge.