PERCEIVED DIFFICULTY AND TRANSLATION PERFORMANCE IN CULTURE-SPECIFIC ELEMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM EFL LEARNERS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Culture-specific elements are widely recognised as challenging in translation, yet the alignment between learners’ perceived difficulties and their actual performance remains underexplored. This study examines these dimensions together with students’ perceived causes of difficulty in translating culture-specific elements. A mixed-methods design was adopted, combining questionnaire data from 113 students with analysis of translation outputs from a subset of 40 students. The findings show that the learners tended to regard idioms and proverbs and culturally marked items as difficult, while perceiving more familiar elements, such as food and forms of address, as less challenging. However, translation performance varied considerably across categories, with over-literal translations and inadequate cultural renderings accounting for more than 80% of responses. The results also indicate only partial alignment between perceived difficulty and observed performance, suggesting that learners’ awareness does not fully capture the complexity of translation tasks. These findings highlight the importance of integrating cultural knowledge, strategic awareness, and reflective practice in translation instruction.
Keywords
culture-specific elements, translation performance, perceived difficulty, perception–performance gap, English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners
Article Details
References
Angelone, E. (2010). Uncertainty, uncertainty management and metacognitive problem solving in the translation task. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition (pp. 17–40). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.03ang
Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619187
Chesterman, A. (2016). Memes of translation: The spread of ideas in translation theory (Rev. ed.). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.123
Hurtado Albir, A. (2015). The acquisition of translation competence. Competences, tasks, and assessment in translator training. Meta, 60(2), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032857ar
Kelly, D. (2005). A handbook for translator trainers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315760292
Latorraca, R. (2023). Lost in post-editing: An exploratory study on translation trainees’ perceived EN>IT post-editing vs. translation performance. Ampersand, 11, 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100144
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.
https://books.google.com.vn/books/about/A_Textbook_of_Translation.html?id=ABpmAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Nguyen, T. M., & Dao, T. X. P. (2020). Learners’ difficulties in self-evaluation in English Vietnamese translation quality assessment. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(10), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.10.18
Pedersen, J. (2011). Subtitling norms for television: An exploration focusing on extralinguistic cultural references. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.98
Pym, A. (2014). Exploring translation theories (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857633
Sun, S. (2015). Measuring translation difficulty: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Across Languages and Cultures, 16(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2015.16.1.2
Sun, S., & Shreve, G. M. (2014). Measuring translation difficulty: An empirical study. Target, 26(1), 98–127. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.26.1.04sun
Tran, D. M. T. (2025). Exploring elements of untranslatability and strategies as represented in the English translation of the Vietnamese work Dế Mèn Phiêu Lưu Ký. Journal of Science and Technology, The University of Danang, 23(6B), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.31130/ud-jst.2025.23(6B).258E