A FRAMEWORK FOR EXAMINING DIGITAL ASSESSMENT LITERACY OF LANGUAGE TEACHERS: THE EXPERTS’ FEEDBACK
Main Article Content
Abstract
Assessment has long been acknowledged as a crucial part of teaching practices, which serves multiple purposes including providing feedback and enhancing learners’ performance (Brown, 2004). In the current era of technology and artificial intelligence (AI), teachers have employed a wide range of online assessment platforms and tools to deliver tests, maintain interaction, and provide feedback to students. In this context, teachers’ language assessment literacy increasingly encompasses digital assessment literacy. Meanwhile, the term “digital assessment literacy” has not been clearly and consistently defined. In the existing literature, “digital assessment literacy” is often separated into “assessment literacy” and “digital literacy” or is defined through a simple or mechanical combination of these two literacies. This study proposes a conceptual framework for examining the digital assessment literacy (DAL) of language teachers and conducts an exploratory content validation through expert consultation. The framework is constructed on the basis of related models of assessment literacy and digital literacy (Davies, 2008; Fulcher, 2012; Pill & Harding, 2013; Taylor, 2013; UNESCO, 2018). Experts in the field of education, including those specialized in assessment and technology, were invited to provide feedback on the proposed framework, specifically its components and sub-components. Feedback on the plausibility and content relevance of the framework as well as other specific comments relating to necessary additions, omissions, or revisions were taken into consideration. The refined framework may serve as a conceptual foundation for further research on stakeholders’ perceptions of language teachers’ digital assessment literacy and its impact on teaching and assessment practices.
Keywords
assessment literacy, digital literacy, digital assessment literacy, conceptual framework, experts’ feedback
Article Details
References
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education. https://evelintampubolon.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/h-_douglas_brown_-_language_assessment.pdf
Churches, A. (2008). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. Australian School Library Association NSW Incorporated. http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/f/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf
Coombe, C., Troudi, S., & Al-Hamly, M. (2012). Foreign and second language teacher assessment literacy: Issues, challenges and recommendations. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 20-29). Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.vn/books/about/The_Cambridge_Guide_to_Second_Language_A.html?id=7STeAgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Davies, A. (2008). Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Language Testing, 25(3), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090156
Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642041
Martin, A. (2006). A European framework for digital literacy. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2006-02-06
Nelson, S. W., & Guerra, P. (2014). Educator beliefs and cultural knowledge: Implications for school improvement efforts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13488595
Pill, J., & Harding, L. (2013). Defining the language assessment literacy gap: Evidence from a parliamentary inquiry. Language Testing, 30(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480337
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Rad, M. R. (2019). The Impact of EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy on Their Assessment Efficiency in Classroom. Britain International of Linguistics, Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 1(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v1i1.14
Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: a learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00112.x
Scarino, A. (2013). Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Language Testing, 30(3), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480128
Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534-539. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3968859
Taylor, L. (2013). Communicating the theory, practice and principles of language testing to test stakeholders: Some reflections. Language Testing, 30(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480338
Thai, T., Sheehan, S., Nguyen, Q. T. N., Nguyen, T. T. P., Nguyen, Y. T. Q., Tran, H. T. T., Nguyen, C. T., Nguyen, H. Q., & Bui, S. (2023). Digital assessment literacy: English assessment practice in Vietnam. In A. L. Gokturk-Saglam & A. E. Sevgi-Sole (Eds.), Emerging practices for online language assessment, exams, evaluation, and feedback (pp. 162-183). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/chapter/325669
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://www.uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2025/08/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf