IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Thanh Ha Ngo1, Thi Bich Phuong Nguyen 2, , Thi Hoai An Nguyen3, Hong Ngoc Nguyen4
1 Trường Đại học New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW, Úc
2 Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education
3 Trường Đại học Paris-Saclay, Trung tâm Nghiên cứu về Toàn cầu hoá, Xung đột, Lãnh thổ và Tính dễ bị tổn thương (CEMOTEV), 47 Boulevard Vauban 78280 Guyancourt Cedex, Pháp
4 Musashino University

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to identify the main features of educational innovations in the context of K-12 schools and significant factors that impact the implementation process. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature review of 76 English peer-reviewed articles that examined educational innovations between 2010 and 2019. Using the concept of institutional isomorphism, resource dependence theory and the sensemaking perspective, the review found that innovation was not being successfully implemented in schools largely due to “actor-related challenges” including issues related to teachers’ worldviews. The review also identified external environmental pressures outside the schools’ purview that restricted or curtailed the integration of educational innovations. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of innovation implementation in education from the perspective of implementation science. Illuminating some features of educational innovation implementation and the associated obstacles, this study offers recommendations for research and practice to improve the prospects of sustainable and scalable innovations in educational contexts.   

Article Details

References

Bauer, M. S., & Kirchner, J. (2020). Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Research, 283, 112376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025
Berkovich, I. (2014). Neoliberal governance and the ‘new professionalism’ of Israeli principals. Comparative Education Review, 58(3), 428–456. https://doi.org/10.1086/676403
Bertels, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2016). Organizational responses to institutional complexity stemming from emerging logics: The role of individuals. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 336–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016641726
Besharov, M. L., & Brickson, S. L. (2016). Organizational identity and institutional forces: Toward an integrative framework. In M. G. Pratt, M. Schultz, B. E. Ashforth, & D. Ravasi (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity, (pp. 396–414). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199689576.013.2
Birken, S. A., Bunger, A. C., Powell, B. J., Turner, K., Clary, A. S., Klaman, S. L., Yu, Y., Whitaker, D. J., Self, S. R., & Rostad, W. L. (2017). Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research. Implementation Science, 12(1), 62. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-017-0592-x
Bryant, D. A. (2016). Revisiting native speaking teachers of English in Hong Kong. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development; Bingley, 18(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-10-2015-0002
Chibás-Ortíz, F., Borroto-Carmona, G., & Almeida-Santos, F. (2014). Managing creativity in collaborative virtual learning environments e: a DL corporate project. Comunicar, 22(43), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-14
Cinganotto, L. (2016). CLIL in Italy: A general overview. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 374–400. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.6
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302
Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
Colbert, V., & Arboleda, J. (2016). Bringing a student-centered participatory pedagogy to scale in Colombia. Journal of Educational Change; Dordrecht, 17(4), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9283-7
Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900201
Corn, J., Tagsold, J. T., & Argueta, R. (2012). Students with special needs and 1:1 computing: A teacher’s perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01251.x
Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. S., & Silver, R. E. (2012). Educational reforms, cultural clashes and classroom practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.676631
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Ellis, A. K. (2017). The Nature of educational innovation. In A. M. Sidorkin & M. K. Warford (Eds.), Reforms and Innovation in Education: Implications for the Quality of Human Capital (pp. 37–51). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60246-2_3
Ensminger, D. C., & Surry, D. W. (2008). Relative ranking of conditions that facilitate innovation implementation in the USA. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1194
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
Fernández‐Batanero, J. M., Cabero, L., & López, E. (2019). Knowledge and degree of training of primary education teachers in relation to ICT taught to students with disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1961-1978. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12675
Fullan, M. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 12–17. https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396031680.pdf
Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203165805
Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017). Making sense of school leaders’ sense-making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628536
Guldberg, K., Parsons, S., Porayska-Pomsta, K., & Keay-Bright, W. (2017). Challenging the knowledge-transfer orthodoxy: Knowledge co-construction in technology-enhanced learning for children with autism. British Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3275
Halle, T., Metz, A., & Martinez-Beck, I. (2013). Applying implementation science in early childhood programs and systems. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2010). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 49-54. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ907118.pdf
Hanley, L. (2011). Mashing up the institution: Teacher as Bricoleur. Radical Teacher, 90, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.5406/radicalteacher.90.0009
Harlow, D. B., & Leak, A. E. (2014). Mapping students’ ideas to understand learning in a collaborative programming environment. Routledge, 24(2–3), 229–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963360
Heck, R. H., Brandon, P. R., & Wang, J. (2001). Implementing site-managed educational changes: examining levels of implementation and effect. Educational Policy, 15(2), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904801015002004
Helsa, Y., & Hartono, Y. (2011). Designing reflection and symmetry learning by using math traditional dance in primary school. Indonesian Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(1), 79–94. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078519.pdf
Jacob, B., Berger, D., Hart, C., & Loeb, S. (2016). Can technology help promote equality of educational opportunities? RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 242–271. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.12
Jong, M. S. Y. (2016). Teachers’ concerns about adopting constructivist online game-based learning in formal curriculum teaching: The VISOLE experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12247
Karasavvidis, I., & Kollias, V. (2017). Understanding technology integration failures in education: The need for zero-order barriers. In A. M. Sidorkin & M. K. Warford (Eds), Reforms and Innovation in Education: Implications for the Quality of Human Capital, (pp. 99–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60246-2_7
Kirby-Harris, R. (2003). Universities responding to policy: Organizational change at the University of Namibia. Higher Education, 45(3), 353–374. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3447485
Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00373.x
Le Cordeur, M. (2014). Constantly weighing the pig will not make it grow: do teachers teach assessment tests or the curriculum? Perspectives in education, 32(1), 138-153. http://www.perspectives-in-education.com/ViewPublication.aspx?PublicationID=22
Le, H. M. (2018). Another textbook project? The implementation of “Escuela Nueva” in Viet Nam. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9230-x
Lee, O., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Large-scale interventions in science education for diverse student groups in varied educational settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21009
Leeman, J., Baquero, B., Bender, M., Choy-Brown, M., Ko, L. K., Nilsen, P., Wangen, M., & Birken, S. A. (2019). Advancing the use of organization theory in implementation science. Preventive Medicine, 129, 105832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105832
Lewin, C., Cranmer, S., & McNicol, S. (2018). Developing digital pedagogy through learning design: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12705
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2011). The logic of appropriateness. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science (pp. 478–497). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0024
Meyer, J. W. (1980). Levels of the educational system and schooling effects. In C. E. Bidwell & D. M. Windham (Eds.), The Analysis of Educational Productivity. Vol. 2: Issues in Macroanalysis (pp.15–63). Ballinger.
Mooij, T., & Smeets, E. (2006). Design, development and implementation of inclusive education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2006.5.2.94
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Ng, W. S. T., & Wilson, E. (2017). A perspective of teachers’ appropriation of educational innovations. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-12-2016-0052
Nilsen, P. (2020). Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. In Implementation Science 3.0 (pp. 53–79). Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en
Paek, K.-M. (2018). Social expectations and workplace challenges: Teaching artists in Korean schools. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12149
Papadakis, S. (2016). Creativity and innovation in European education. Ten years eTwinning. Past, present and the future. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(3–4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.082315
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (Eds.). (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496213
Pimlott‐Wilson, H., & Coates, J. K. (2019). Rethinking Learning? Challenging and Accommodating neoliberal educational agenda in the integration of forest school into mainstream educational settings. The Geographical Journal 185(3), 268–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12302
Priestley, M., Miller, K., Barrett, L., & Wallace, C. (2011). Teacher learning communities and educational change in Scotland: The Highland experience. British Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903540698
Puttick, S. (2017). ‘You’ll see that everywhere’: Institutional isomorphism in secondary school subject departments. School Leadership & Management, 37(1–2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1293633
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496176
Sanz-Menéndez, L., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2003). Coping with environmental pressures: Public research organizations responses to funding crises. Research Policy, 32(8), 1293–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00120-8
Sargent, T. C. (2015). Professional learning communities and the diffusion of pedagogical innovation in the Chinese education system. Comparative Education Review, 59(1), 102–132. https://doi.org/10.1086/678358
Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 164–182). University of Chicago Press.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. Sage Publication.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Sergeeva, N. (2017). Innovation and sensemaking—ProQuest. Composing the Innovation Symphony. The XXVIII ISPIM Innovation Conference, Vienna, Austria. https://search-proquest-com.wwwproxy1.library.unsw.edu.au/docview/1920222043?pq-origsite=primo
Sidorkin, A. M., & Warford, M. K. (2017). Reforms and Innovation in Education: Implications for the Quality of Human Capital. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60246-2
Smirnov, I. (2017). Identifying factors associated with the survival and success of grassroots educational innovations. In A. M. Sidorkin & M. K. Warford (Eds.), Reforms and Innovation in Education: Implications for the Quality of Human Capital (pp. 85–98). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60246-2_6
Sokal, L., & Katz, J. (2015). Oh, Canada: Bridges and barriers to inclusion in Canadian schools. Support for Learning, 30(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12078
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Sulisworo, D., Sulistyo, E. N., & Akhsan, R. N. (2017). The motivation impact of open educational resources utilization on physics learning using Quipper School app. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340399
Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Impacts of COVID-19 on primary, secondary and tertiary education: a comprehensive review and recommendations for educational practices. Education Research for Policy and Practice, 22, 23–61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10671-022-09319-y
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.05.001
Taylor, S. P. (2017). What is innovation? A study of the definitions, academic models and applicability of innovation to an example of social housing in England. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(11), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.511010
Thomas, D. C., Berry, A., Djuricich, A. M., Kitto, S., Kreutzer, K. O., Van Hoof, T. J., Carney, P. A., Kalishman, S., & Davis, D. (2017). What is implementation science and what forces are driving a change in medical education? American Journal of Medical Quality, 32(4), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860616662523
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/sensemaking-in-organizations/book4988
Wilcox, K. C., & Lawson, H. A. (2018). Teachers’ agency, efficacy, engagement, and emotional resilience during policy innovation implementation. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9313-0
Wiseman, A. W., Astiz, M. F., & Baker, D. P. (2014). Comparative education research framed by neo-institutional theory: A review of diverse approaches and conflicting assumptions. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(5), 688–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.800783
Zhan, Y., & So, W. M. W. (2017). Views and practices from the Chalkface: Development of a formative assessment multimedia earning environment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1345783
Zhang, T. (2010). From environment to sustainable development: China’s strategies for ESD in basic education. International Review of Education, 56(2), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-010-9159-7