INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF FILLERS IN SPONTANEOUS SPEECH ON FLUENCY PERCEPTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fillers have conventionally been regarded as speech disfluencies, reflecting uncertainty, anxiety, or lack of planning on the part of the speaker. However, emerging research has suggested that they may also signal cognitive effort and serve communicative functions. This exploratory study examined how different types and positions of fillers influence perceived fluency in spontaneous speech, focusing on three groups of raters: Vietnamese linguistics students, Vietnamese non-linguistics students, and native English speakers. Fifteen participants (five per group) completed a listening rating task, assessing fluency in speech samples containing silent pauses, unlexicalized filled pauses, and lexicalized filled pauses in varied positions. Given the small sample size, the analysis aimed to identify preliminary trends rather than produce generalizable conclusions. Results indicated that both the forms and positions of fillers affected fluency perceptions across L1 and L2 rater groups, with the form of the filler exerting a more pronounced effect than its position. These findings suggest a greater need for linguistics students, in particular, to be aware of the specific fillers they use in speech. Future research should expand the participant pool to increase statistical power and explore in greater depth how different listener groups interpret fillers in spontaneous speech.
Keywords
fillers, spontaneous speech, perceived fluency
Article Details
References
Clark, H. H. & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
Corley, M., & Stewart, O. W. (2008). Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00068.x
Dinh, T. B. N., & Tran, T. D. (2020). Key factors influencing learners' oral fluency in English speaking classes: A case at a public university in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(6), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4631
Dressler, A. M., & O’Brien, M. G. (2017). Rethinking perceptions of fluency. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0026
Erten, S. (2014). Teaching fillers and students’ filler usage: A study conducted at ESOGU Preparation School. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(3), 67–79. https://www.iises.net/teaching-fillers-and-students-filler-usage-a-study-condu.html
Foster, P. (2020). Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching, 53(4), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482000018X
Götz, S. (2013). Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/scl.53/html
Kharismawan, P. (2017). The types and the functions of the fillers used in Barack Obama’s speeches. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 111–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010112
Kirjavainen, M., Crible, L., & Beeching, K. (2021). Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um. Language and Speech, 65(2), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211011201
Kosmala, L. & Morgenstern, A. (2019). Should ‘uh’ and ‘um’ be categorized as markers of disfluency? The use of fillers in a challenging conversational context. In L. Degand, G. Gilquin, L. Meurant & A. C. Simon (Eds.), Fluency and Disfluency Across Languages and Language Varieties, (pp. 67–89). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331841232_Should_'uh'_and_'um'_be_categorized_as_markers_of_disfluency_The_use_of_fillers_in_a_challenging_conversational_context
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001
Monica, M. (2022). Enhancing EFL undergraduate students’ speaking fluency through chunking. MATAI: International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.30598/matail.v2i2.5946
Rose, R. L. (1998). The communicative value of filled pauses in spontaneous speech (Unpublished master thesis). https://byvn.net/Yql5
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2005). Strategic and on-line planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (Vol. 11, pp. 193–216). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/lllt.11.12ske/html
Stenstrom, A. (1994). An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845449
Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2020). Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000421
Suzuki, S., Kormos, J., & Uchihara, T. (2021). The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta‐analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 435–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12706
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (Vol. 11, pp. 239–273). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav/html
Tottie, G. (2014). On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language 21(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.02tot
Warren, P. (2013). Introducing Psycholinguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978531
Wu, J. (2002). A quantitative comparison of disfluencies types between native and non-native English speakers in spontaneous speech (Unpublished master thesis). https://byvn.net/qhXO