ENGLISH - VIETNAMESE AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING TEXTBOOK COVER DESIGNS: A CONTRASTIVE STUDY FROM THE THEORY OF MULTIMODAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: This mixed-method study compares and contrasts Vietnamese and English aeronautical engineering textbook covers using Multimodal Discourse Analysis (MDA) by Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) visual grammar framework. By examining the cover designs through interactive meaning (social distance and perspective) and compositional meaning (information value, framing, and salience) across 25 covers per language, the study unveils similarities in the use of photographic distances for social relationships, predominance of subjective angle images, framing techniques, top-down layouts, and consistent title/author elements. However, differences arise in the book cover design choices based on the visual grammar framework. Vietnamese covers often depict impersonal distance via long shots, while English covers favour oblique angles, suggesting detachment. Vietnamese covers segregate images and text, whereas English covers integrate images as backgrounds. Vietnamese covers include more supplementary metadata like genre and audience. These differences highlight cultural, stylistic, and marketing influences across linguistic contexts, demonstrating that integrating multimodal and contrastive analyses deepens understanding of textbook covers as complex semiotic systems and informs the development of more effective, culturally relevant designs to enhance aeronautical engineering education.
Article Details
Keywords
contrastive analysis, Multimodal Discourse Analysis (MDA), aeronautical engineering textbooks, visual grammar, cover design
References
Bui, M. H. (2008). Contrastive Linguistics. Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Darling, S. (2019). How are book covers and their components represented in the digital market? Interscript Journal, 2(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2398-4732.004
Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33, 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025006310503
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., & Mullins, B. (2015). Judging a book by its cover. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.1.02dix
Guo, F. B., & Feng, X. (2017). A multimodal discourse analysis of advertisements based on visual grammar. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6(3), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i3.1132
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Haslam, A. (2006). Book design. Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
Imansari, P., & Harti, L. M. S. (2023). Multimodal analysis on the cover books of the translated bestselling feminist fiction. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2022 (IJCAH 2022): Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (pp. 1989–1999). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-008-4_214
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
Li, M., Li, L., & Miao, J. (2018). A translated volume and its many covers: A multimodal analysis of the influence of ideology. Social Semiotics, 29(2), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1464248
Matthews, N., & Moody, N. (2007). Judging a book by its cover: Fans, publishers, designers, and the marketing of fiction. Ashgate.
Muhassin, M., Putri, N., Hidayati, D., & Pradana, S. (2022). A multimodal discourse analysis of the English textbooks’ covers. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 15(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v15i1.12107
O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SFMDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210
Royce, T. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal. In T. D. Royce & W. L. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63-109). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
Sunderland, J., & McGlashan, M. (2012). The linguistic, visual, and multimodal representation of two-mum and two-dad families in children’s picture books. Language and Literature, 21(2), 189-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011435863
Vietnam National University (2012). Regulations on Textbook Management of Vietnam National University, Hanoi. https://vnu.edu.vn/upload/vanban/2012/08/28/2012_05_18-1600_QD-DHQGHN_Quy-dinh-ve-cong-tac-giao-trinh-cua-DHQGHN---Danh-sach.pdf
Wantoro, W. (2020). The method in designing book series cover. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business, Economic, Social Science, and Humanities – Humanities and Social Sciences Track (ICOBEST-HSS 2019) (pp. 100-103). Atlantic Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200108.022
Wu, J., & Wu, Q. (2021). A multimodal analysis of Jane Eyre book covers. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 17(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2021-0004
Zhang, W., Zheng, Y., Miyazono, T., Uchida, S., & Iwana, B. K. (2021). Towards book cover design via layout graphs. In J. Lladós, D. Lopresti, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Document analysis and recognition – ICDAR 2021 (Vol. 12823, pp. 642-657). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86334-0_42