UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCE WITH ONLINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TESTING IN 2021 AND 2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
During the Covid-19 pandemic, online assessment is widely used as a form of temporary solution to ensure uninterrupted teaching and learning activities. At the same time, the world education, including Vietnamese education, is rapidly changing in line with the trend of digital transformation and building open educational models. In that common trend, online testing and assessment will become more and more popular. With the purpose of looking back on what has happened as well as forming a basis for planning for the future, this study was conducted through collecting opinions of 685 students who participated in online language testing and assessment held both at class scale and on a large scale in 2021 and 2022. The study's data collection tool was a questionnaire about students' experiences with the pros and cons of online language testing and assessment. Research results show that students at this university had quite positive experiences with the school's online language testing and assessment activities. When comparing the data obtained from students majoring in English and those majoring in other foreign languages, some significant differences in the experiences of the two groups were found. These research results have certain implications for the future implementation and expansion of online language testing and assessment activities.
Article Details
Keywords
online language testing and assessment, online at-home tests, university students’ experience of online tests
References
Alsadoon, H. (2017). Students’ perception of e-assessment at Saudi Electronic University. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 16(1), 147-153.
Bachman, L. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Baleni, Z. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228-236.
Björnsson, J. K. (2008). Changing Icelandic national testing from traditional paper and pencil
based tests to computer based assessment: some background, challenges and problems to
overcome. In F. S. Scheuermann & A. G. Pereira (Eds.), Toward a research agenda on
computer based assessment: Challenges and needs for European educational
measurement (10-14). European Commission.
Bộ Giáo dục & Đào tạo. (2021). Thông tư 09/2021 v/v Quy định về quản lý và tổ chức dạy học trực tuyến trong cơ sở giáo dục phổ thông và cơ sở giáo dục thường xuyên. https://moet.gov.vn/pages/tim-kiem.aspx?ItemID=7284
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.
Carr, N. T. (2011). Designing and analyzing language tests. Oxford University Press.
Ceka, B., & O’Geen, A. (2019). Evaluating Student Performance on Computer-Based versus Handwritten Exams: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the Classroom. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 757-762.
Chung, S., & Choi, L. (2021). The development of sustainable assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of the English language program in South Korea. Sustainability, 13(8), 4499-4512.
Dermo, J. (2009). E-assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perception of e-assessment. British Journal of Education Technology, 40(2), 203-214.
Dreher, C., Reiners, T., & Dreher, H. (2011). Investigating factors affecting the uptake of automated assessment technology. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10(1), 161-181.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
Forrester, A. (2020). Addressing the challenges of group speaking assessments in the time of the coronavirus. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 74-88.
Gehringer, E. F., & Peddycord III, B. W. (2013). Experience with online and open-web exams. Journal of Instructional Research, 2, 10-18.
Ghanbari, N., & Nowroozi, S. (2021). The practice of online assessment in an EFL context amidst Covid-19 pandemic: Views from teachers. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 11-27.
Huda, S. S. M., Kabir, M., & Siddiq, T. (2020). E-assessment in higher education: Students’ perspective. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 16(2), 250-258.
Isbell, D. R., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Test review: Current options in at-home language proficiency tests for making high stakes decisions. Language Testing, 37(4), 600–619.
Jeong, H. (2014). A comparative study of scores on computer-based tests and paper-based tests.
Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(4), 410-422.
Kim, H. R., Bowles, M., Yan, X., & Chung, S. J. (2018). Examining the comparability between paper- and computer-based versions of an integrated writing placement test. Assessing Writing, 36, 49-62.
Kucherova, O. O., & Ushakova, I. O. (2022). Effectiveness of online testing in General English University Course from teacher and student perspectives. Information Technology Learning Tools, 87(1), 185-198.
Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2021). Experiencing e-assessment during Covid-19: An analysis of Indian students’ perception. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 15(2), 114–134.
Li, M., Luo, L., Sikdar, S., Nizam, N. I., Gao, S., Shan, H., Kruger, M. Kruger, U., Mohamed, H., Xia, L., & Wang, G. (2021). Optimized collusion prevention for online exams during social distancing. Science of Learning, 6(1), 5.
McMillian, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standard-based instruction (6th Ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Nguyễn, H. T., & Nguyễn, P. C. (2022). EFL students’ attitudes towards the English online assessments. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(5), 50-60.
Nguyễn, T. Đ., & Nguyễn, T. T. (2021). Đề xuất khung tham chiếu năng lực công nghệ số dành cho giảng viên Đại học Quốc gia TPHCM. Tạp chí Phát triển Khoa học và Công nghệ - Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn, 5(4), 1385-1396.
Nguyễn, T. N. Q., Nguyễn, T. Q. Y., Trần, T. T. H., Bùi, T. S., Nguyễn, T. P. T., Nguyễn, T. C., & Nguyễn, Q. H. (2022). Hoạt động kiểm tra đánh giá ngoại ngữ trực tuyến năm 2021-2022: Ý kiến đánh giá từ học sinh trung học. Kỷ yếu hội thảo khoa học quốc tế dành cho nghiên cứu sinh và học viên cao học (IGRS2022) (699-710). Vietnam National University Press.
Ockey, G. J. (2021). An overview of Covid-19’s impact on English language university admissions and placement tests. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(1), 1-5.
Ockey, G. J., Muhammad, A. A., Prasetyo, A. H., Elnegahy, S., Kochem, T., Neiriz, R., Kim, H., & Beck, J. (2021). Iowa State University’s English placement test of oral communication in times of Covid-19. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(1), 26-35.
Purpura, J., Davoodifard, M., & Voss, E. (2021) Conversion to remote proctoring of the community English language program online placement exam at Teachers College, Columbia University. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(1), 42-50.
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Shraim, K. (2019). Online examination practices in higher education institutions: Learners’ perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TOJDE, 20(4), 185-196.