Demonstratives as Sentence Final Particles and the Architecture of the Periphery in Vietnamese
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper analyzes Vietnamese demonstrative sentence-final particles (SFP) from the perspective of generative syntax. Such demonstratives as đây, kia, này, kìa, and đấy can be used at the end of a sentence to mark the psychological distance between the speaker and the proposition.
These SFPs can be divided into two groups: particles in Group I (namely đây and kia) are used to describe the relation between the speaker and the proposition while elements from Group II (i.e., này, kìa, and đấy) are employed to call for the addressee’s attention or to persuade the addressee to believe in the propositional content. đây này, kia kìa, and kia đấy are three cases of SFPs used in clusters.
From Generative Grammar and Cartography’s perspective, the sentential periphery can be split into three functional projections. The lowest functional projection, namely AttP, encodes the speaker’s commitment to the proposition, while attP encodes the addressee’s propositional attitude. The highest layer DiscP represents the speaker’s attitude towards the addressee. Particles from Group I are base-generated at the Head position of AttP, whereas Group II belongs to attP.
Article Details
Keywords
Demonstratives, Sentence-final particles, cartography
References
Benincà, P. (2001). The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In G. Cinque & G. Salvi (Eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi (pp. 39-64). Elsevier.
Beyssade, C., & Marandin, J. M. (2006). The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee. Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, 6, 37-68.
Bui, T. L. (2014). Vietnamese demonstratives: A spatially-based polysemy network [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Queensland]. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2014.430
Cheng, L. L. Sh. (1991). On the typology of wh-questions [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/cheng91.pdf
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford University Press.
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2008). The cartography of syntactic structures. In V. Moscati (Ed.), STiL-Studies in Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 42-58). CISCL Press.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). American Psychological Association.
Gunlogson, C. (2003). True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English (Outstanding dissertations in linguistics). Routledge.
Heim, J., Keupdjio, H., Lam, Z. W. M., Osa-Gómez, A., Thoma, S., & Wiltschko, M. (2016). Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 37(2), 109-129.
Lam, Z. W. M. (2014). A complex ForceP for speaker-and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 35(2), 61-80.
Lau, Ch. M. (2019). On the structure of sentential periphery from the perspective of Cantonese sentence-final particle aa3 [Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong]. https://repository.lib.cuhk.edu.hk/sc/item/cuhk-2398978
Le, G. H. (2015). Vietnamese sentence final particles [Master’s thesis, University of Southern California]. http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/digital/collection/p15799coll3/id/536491
Lee, H. T. T. (1986). Studies on quantification in Chinese [Doctoral dissertation, UCLA]. https://vn1lib.org/ireader/5441031
Li, B. (2006). Chinese final particles and the syntax of the periphery. LOT.
Nguyen, V. H. (2020). Heteroglossia: Another SFG-based approach to treatment of word order as a means for expressing modality in Vietnamese. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(4), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4572
Pan, V. J. (2019). Architecture of the periphery in Chinese: Cartography and minimalism. Routledge.
Pan, V. J., & Paul W. (2016). Why Chinese SFPs are neither optional nor disjunctors. Lingua, 170, 23-34.
Paul, W. (2014). Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica, 68(1), 77-115.
Paul, W., & Pan, V. J. (2017). What you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complementizers. In J. Bayer & V. Struckmeier (Eds.), Linguistische arbeiten: Discourse particles- formal approaches to their syntax and semantics (Vol. 564, pp. 49-77). De Gruyter.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337). Kluwer.
Sybesma, R., & Li, B. (2007). The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua, 117, 1739-1783.
Tang, S. W. (1998). Parametrization of features in syntax [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. https://www.swtang.net/doc/tang1998a.pdf
Tang, S. W. (2010). Formal Chinese syntax. Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Tang, S. W. (2020). Cartographic syntax of performative projections: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 29(1), 1-30.
Tran, Q. H. (2015). Comparative analysis of sentence-final particles in Chinese and Vietnamese [Doctoral dissertation, Fujian Normal University].
Vo, T. M. H. (2012). A comparative study of Chinese and Vietnamese tone particles [Doctoral dissertation, East China Normal University]. https://wap.cnki.net/lunwen-1012488381.html
Wiltschko, M., & Heim, J. (2016). The syntax of confirmationals. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents (pp. 303-340). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
White, P. R. R., & Motoki, S. (2006). Dialogistic positioning and interpersonal style - A framework for stylistic comparison. In K. Aijmer & A-M. Simon-Vandenbergen (Eds.), Pragmatic markers in contrast (pp. 189-214). Elsevier.
Xu, J. N. (2008). Discourse modality of Mandarin Chinese. The selected books of Oriental cultures. Kunlun Chubanshe.