EXAMINING VIETNAMESE EFL LECTURERS’ PREFERENCE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES USED IN ONLINE AND FACE-TO-FACE RECEPTIVE SKILLS LECTURES

Anh Phuong Dang1,, Duy Khang Nguyen2
1 School of Foreign Language, Can Tho University, 411D, April 30 street, Hung Loi ward, Ninh Kieu district, Can Tho city, Vietnam
2 Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City - Campus in Ben Tre, 99A, AH60, Phu Tan ward, Ben Tre city, Ben Tre province, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigated the instructional strategies preferred by Vietnamese English as a foreign language (EFL) lecturers in both online and face-to-face teaching environments, focusing on teaching receptive skills. Drawing from Walker's (2008) framework for effective lecturing, which emphasized the creative use of instructional strategies and technology, this research surveyed thirty-eight lecturers regarding their preferences. The survey revealed some strategies that had the same extent of preference and some being disliked in both settings. Additionally, some instructional strategies were preferred in online teaching over face-to-face teaching and vice versa. The interviews also identified some primary reasons for lecturers’ preference for instructional strategies and their recommendation of choosing appropriate strategies for teaching receptive skills. These findings underscored the nuanced preferences of EFL lecturers in selecting instructional strategies for different teaching contexts, offering insights into the evolution of English Language Teaching in Vietnam.


 

Article Details

References

Adawiah, R., & Manurung, K. (2021). The analysis of teaching strategies in reading comprehension. E-Journal of ELTS (English Language Teaching Society), 9(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.22487/elts.v9i2.1875
Afifi, M. K., & Alamri, S. S. (2014). Effective principles in designing e-course in light of learning theories. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.43806
Ahmadi, M. R., & Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). Reciprocal Teaching Strategies and Their Impacts on English Reading Comprehension. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(10), 2053-2060. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.10.2053-2060
Akdemir, O., & Koszalka, T. A. (2008). Investigating the relationships among instructional strategies and learning styles in online environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1451-1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.004
Akdeniz, C. (2016). Instructional process and concepts in theory and practice: Improving the Teaching Process. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2519-8
Al-Jawi, F. D. (2010). Teaching the receptive skills. Listening and Reading Skills. Mecca: UMM Al Qura University Press.
Alakrash, H. M., & Razak, N. A. (2022). Education and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Lessons from COVID-19. Computers, Materials & Continua, 70(1), 951-962. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.014288
Ariely, D., & Norton, M. I. (2008). How actions create–not just reveal–preferences. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(1), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.008
Ariski, S., Rositasari, T., & Saraswaty, D. R. (2021). The Influence of Think-Pair-Share Technique (Tps) to Teach Reading Comprehension to the Tenth Grade Students. English Community Journal, 5(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v5i1.3308
Arsaf, A. S. (2020). Teaching English in Industrial Revolution 4.0: Challenges and Opportunities. Bachelor, UIN Ar-raniry.
Betsch, T. (2011). The stability of preferences–a social-cognition view. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 290-1-3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00290
Black, G. (2002). A comparison of traditional, online, and hybrid methods of course delivery. Journal of Business Administration Online, 1(1), 1-9. https://www.atu.edu/business/jbao/spring2002/black.pdf
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd Edition ed.). Heinle & Heinle Publisher, Boston.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge
Colombo, M. (2011). Teaching English language learners: 43 strategies for successful K-8 classrooms. Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.
Demuynck, T., & Hjertstrand, P. (2019). Samuelson’s approach to revealed preference theory: Some recent advances. Springer.
Duong, M., & Pham, T. T. T. (2023). The Application of Digital Storytelling in Teaching English Listening Skills to Young Learners: Teachers’ Perceptions of Benefits and Constraints. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 39(2), 164-174. https://doi.org/https://jfs.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/index.php/fs/article/view/5060
Dyer, J. S., & Jia, J. (2013). Preference theory. Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, Boston.
Education, A., & Hoskins, M. (2002). Instructional strategies. Alberta, Canada.
Elayyan, S. (2021). The future of education according to the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.737193
George, S. V., Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. (2018). Early career teachers’ self-efficacy: A longitudinal study from Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 62(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944118779601
Hirumi, A. (2013). Three Levels of Planned Elearning Interactions A Framework for Grounding Research and the Design of eLearning Programs. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(1), 1-16. https://pressbooks.online.ucf.edu/app/uploads/sites/153/2020/08/QRDE_2013_eLrnFrameUpdate_Hirumi.pdf
Ho, D. P. K., & Phan, T. N. T. (2024). Student Persistence in Online Learning: A Literature Review. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(1), 76-102. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5211
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238767486_Asynchronous_and_synchronous_e-learning
Hsieh, P.-H. (2010). Globally-perceived experiences of online instructors: A preliminary exploration. Computers & Education, 54(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.007
Ismail, N. S. C., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). The teaching of listening strategies in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(6), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i6/7279
Kuama, S. (2016). Is Online Learning Suitable for All English Language Students? PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 52, 53-82. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.52.1.3
Latupono, F., & Nikijuluw, R. (2022). The Importance of Teaching Listening Strategies in English Language Context. MATAI: International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30598/matail.v2i2.5935
Li, W., & Renandya, W. A. (2012). Effective approaches to teaching listening: Chinese EFL teachers’ perspectives. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(4), 79-111.
Luyt, I. (2013). Bridging spaces: Cross-cultural perspectives on promoting positive online learning experiences. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.42.1.b
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The internet and higher education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Nemtchinova, E. (2013). Teaching Listening. TESOL International Association.
Nguyen, L. D. (2023). Non-English Majors’ Perceptions of English Proficiency Standards and CEFR-V in Tertiary Education in Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 7(2), 136-145.
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2023.281
Nguyen, T. L. P. (2022). Teachers’ strategies in teaching reading comprehension. International Journal of Language Instruction, 1(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.22113
Nunan, D. (2001). New ways in teaching listening. The Journal of Tesol France, 8, 51-66. https://www.tesol-france.org/uploaded_files/files/TESOL%20Vol%208%202001%20C6.pdf
Nurdianingsih, F. (2021). Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(2), 285-289. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i2.p285-289
Ogu, M. I. (2013). Rational choice theory: Assumptions, strengths and greatest weaknesses in application outside the western milieu context. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Nigerian Chapter), 1(3), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.12816/0003628
Prime Minister of SRV. (2008). Teaching and Learning Foreign Languages in the National Education System, Period 2008-2020. Issued under Decision No. 1400/QĐ-TTg signed by the Prime Minister of the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
Prime Minister of SRV. (2017). Teaching and Learning Foreign Languages in the National Education System, Period 2017-2025. Issued under Decision No. 2080/QĐ-TTg signed by the Prime Minister of the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
Redmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. In Proceedings ASCILITE 2011: 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 1050-1060).
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (Second ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Sullivan, C. (2016). Student preferences and expectations in an English classroom. Language Culture, 52, 35-47. https://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/hermes/ir/re/27708/gengo0052000350.pdf
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of educational research, 76(1), 93-135. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093
Tarigan, A. M., & Pohan, I. (2022). Listening teaching strategies in online learning. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i1.17803
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Ugwu, E. O. (2019). Effect of Student Teams Achievement Division and Think-Pair-Share on Students' Achievement in Reading Comprehension. African Journal of Teacher Education, 8, 218-237. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v8i0.5209
Vietnam MOET. (2014). Six-level framework for foreign language proficiency in Vietnam. Issued under Circular No. 01/TT-BGDĐT by the Vietnam’s Minister of the Ministry of Education and Training
Vietnam MOET. (2021a). Regulations on Management and Organization of Online Teaching in General Education and Continuing Education Institutions. Issued under Circular No. 09/2021/TT-BGDĐT by the Vietnam’s Minister of the Ministry of Education and Training.
Vietnam MOET. (2021b). Regulations on University Level Training. Issued under Circular No. 08/2021/TT-BGDĐT by the Vietnam’s Minister of the Ministry of Education and Training.
Walker, R. J. (2008). Twelve characteristics of an effective teacher: A longitudinal, qualitative, quasi-research study of in-service and pre-service teachers' opinions. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 61-68. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ815372
Wibowo, Y. E. W., Syafrizal, S., & Syafryadin, S. (2020). An analysis of English teachers' strategies in teaching reading comprehension. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 4(1), 20-27. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/304931242.pdf
Wuensch, K., Aziz, S., Ozan, E., Kishore, M. & Tabrizi, M.H.N. (2008). Pedagogical Characteristics of Online and Face-to-Face Classes. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 523-532. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24201/