THE CATEGORY OF VOICE IN VIETNAMESE: A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article is a functional description of the category of voice – arguably, one of the most slippery notions in the grammar of Vietnamese that seems to resist any satisfactory treatment. The theoretical framework employed for describing and interpreting the category is Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). Three questions which form the basis of this study are: (1) “Does the system of VOICE exist in Vietnamese?”; if so, (2) “What are the delicate options available in the environment of VOICE in Vietnamese?”; and (3) “How can these delicate options be distinguished from the SFL perspective?” The answers to these questions show that unlike formal grammatical descriptions, VOICE exists in Vietnamese as a system; the environment of VOICE opens up a number of delicate options; and these delicate options can be distinguished along the three metafunctions: experiential, interpersonal, and textual. The answers to these questions also show that SFL is a highly relevant framework for describing and interpreting the system of VOICE in Vietnamese: SFL helps us investigate the category from a number of dimensions, enabling us to have a more comprehensive view of it. The study contributes to the application of SFL to the description of Vietnamese grammar - a non-Indo-European language, opening up new potentials for a comprehensive approach to the description of a Systemic Functional Grammar of Vietnamese for research, application, and teaching purposes.
Article Details
Keywords
voice in Vietnamese, ergativity, transitivity, mood, theme
References
Bùi Đức Tịnh (1952). Văn phạm Việt Nam [A grammar of Vietnamese]. Nhà xuất bản Phạm Văn Tươi.
Diệp Quang Ban (1987). Câu đơn tiếng Việt [The simple sentence in Vietnamese]. Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục.
Diệp Quang Ban (2013). Ngữ pháp Việt Nam [A grammar of Vietnamese]. Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2012). Dẫn luận ngữ pháp chức năng [An introduction to Functional Grammar] (Hoàng Văn Vân dịch) (tái bản lần thứ hai). Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525/vnufs.4229
Nguyễn Kim Thản (1977). Động từ trong tiếng Việt [Verbs in Vietnamese]. Nhà xuất bản Khoa học xã hội.
Trần Trọng Kim, Bùi Kỷ, & Phạm Duy Khiêm (1940). Việt-Nam Văn-Phạm [A grammar of Vietnamese] (tái bản lần thứ tám). Nhà xuất bản Tân Việt.
English
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. The M. I. T. Press.
Collins Cobuild (1996). Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. HarperCollins Publishers.
Davidse, K. (1992). Transitivity/Ergativity: The Janus-headed grammar of actions and events. In M. Davies & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent theories and practices (pp. 105-35). Pinter Publishers.
Emeneau, M. B. (1951). Studies in Vietnamese (Annamese) grammar. University of California Press.
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967a). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 37-81.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967b). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199-244.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1968). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 3. Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 179-215.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics (pp. 140-65). Penguin.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). Halliday: System and function in language (G. Kress, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Ideas about language. In M. A. K. Halliday (Ed.), Aims and perspectives in linguistics (pp. 32-49). Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). An introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hasan, R. (1996). Ways of saying: Ways of meaning (C. Cloran, D. Butt & G. Williams, Eds.). Cassell.
Hoang, V. V. (1997). An Experiential Grammar of the Vietnamese clause: A functional description [Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University].
Hoang, V. V. (2012). An Experiential Grammar of the Vietnamese clause. Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Kaplan, J. (1995). English grammar: Principles and facts (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall, Inc.
Le, D. N. (1980). Modality in English and Vietnamese: A systemic comparison [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Sydney.
Lyons, J. (1979). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. International Language Sciences Publishers.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teresa, K., & Lam, M. (2010). Key terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. Continuum.
Nguyen, D. H. (1979). 201 Vietnamese Verbs. Barron’s Educational Series.
Palmer, R. F. (1980). The English verb (8th ed.). Longman.
Shore, S. (1992). Aspects of Systemic Functional Grammar of Finnish [Doctoral Dissertation, Macquarie University]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.129.1396&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Svartvik, J. (1966). On voice in the English verb. Mouton.
Thompson, L. C. (1985). A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Mon-Khmer Studies Journal, 13-14, 1-367.
French
Bouchet, A. (1912). Cours elementaire D’annamite. Imprimerie d'Extrême-Orient.
Cordier, G. (1932). Cours de la langue Annamite. Annee preparatoire: Grammaire et exercises. (N.Pub).
Grammont, M., & Le, Q. T. (1911). Études sur la langue Annamite. In Mémoires de la société de linguistique de Paris (Vol. 17). Imprimerie Nationale.
Truong, V. K. (1867). Abrégé de Grammaire Annamite. Imprimerie Impériale.